If so, do you consistently report it and get the feeling that it gets dealt with? Of course there are instances dedicated solely to being human trash

  • Nico_Ferra@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    While I tend to agree with your opinion, that people should be allowed to express their political view of the world, I also think that intolerance is not a political view. It’s just the heritage of a mob mentality that’s more suitable for the dark ages, rather than the globalized world we live into.
    So if you want to spout about dumb non-facts like “ethnic replacement” and such, you can take a walk and come back when you’ll have a mindset more appropriate for this century.

    • Otome-chan@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      What people consider “intolerance” is not a consensus. I consider some people to be very intolerant, while they think they aren’t intolerant at all. when you say intolerance shouldn’t be allowed, you have to say which one of us is right. who is getting kicked off for their “intolerance”? because whichever one you pick, they’ll be upset and think you are intolerant.

      • Nico_Ferra@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Dude we all know what “intolerance” or “racism” mean, don’t build an elaborate system of mirrors and pulleys to fuck yourself in your own ass.
        Playing devil’s advocate on this matter is what allowed this kind of behaviour to exist in the first place

        • Otome-chan@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          You say “we all know what they mean” but it really isn’t clear. I’ve met people saying “racist” just refers to all white people. I’ve seen “intolerence” refer to transsexuals merely saying we exist, while hating on transsexuals is “tolerance”.

          Perhaps I’ve been in political discussions too long. The words on the surface are obvious. Be chill, don’t attack people for the way they were born, etc. but people who strongly vocally oppose “intolerance and racism” often don’t mean that. they take “racist” to mean “simply commenting on race in a way they disagree with” and “intolerance” to mean “disagree with them”.

          I’m always wary of when people are crying to censor someone, because historically those doing the censoring have not used their power fairly.

    • gus@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I agree with your first sentence and that’s what I meant when I said “radical exceptions”. I think the issue is many people coming from Reddit will equate anything that is right-leaning as racism or hate speech. Like I don’t want ernest to be in here during the US elections banning magazines supporting the Republican candidate

      Sure, get rid of the users talking about how the Jews control the world or are going on frequent racist tangents. But I think there’s a lot more to gain about getting perspective from a place I might not necessarily agree with than just getting rid of it altogether. I hope people can be mature enough here to feel the same

      • Nico_Ferra@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah for sure, political debate (done in a constructive way) is always helpful for both sides.
        Extremism are to keep separated from political views, from both sides and that’s why I don’t hang out in Lemmy’s main instance too: because (while most people in there are cool) there are a bunch of self proclaimed “communists” that takes the sides of Russia in the war of Ukraine or denies the genocide of the Uyghur ethnic groups operated by the Chinese government.
        And they use the same catchphrase the far-right extremists use: “don’t believe what mainstream media tell you”.
        That’s because extremism is not a political problem, is a social issue. Extremists only use politics to have a justifiable outlet.

      • pterodactyl@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Like I don’t want ernest to be in here during the US elections banning magazines supporting the Republican candidate

        Just to be clear the last time this happened anywhere online was r/The_Donald, which was objectively a radical exception promoting racism and hate speech while also being a sub “supporting the Republican candidate”. You are being misleading.

        • Otome-chan@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          when you declare something “racist and hate speech” there’s not a consensus on what that means. For example, I think affirmative action is very racist, yet people who strongly oppose “racism and hate speech” openly and happily support it.