Interesting bit of news for the threadiverse. All three of these are fairly large lemmy instances

  • bill_1992@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    59
    ·
    2 years ago

    Isn’t the whole point of the fediverse that you get to create and craft your experience for your community? There’s a really good reason defederating is a feature. I don’t get it, Beehaw decides to use the features of federation so now we: firstly become tribalistic (them vs us), and secondly decide to get angry? Like it or not, this is what you signed up for when you wanted federation.

    I don’t see the point of getting angry like this, and really don’t see how this negativity being conducive to a thriving community. Some new people are going to explore fediverse, see tribalistic mudslinging among instances, and say “not for me.”

    I’d say respect their decision and move on, if it’s not for you it’s not for you.

    • zalack@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      2 years ago

      Yeah, they’re saying “look, we only have four mods, have a highly targeted type of community we are trying to build, and have had to disproportionately moderate users from these instances” which seems reasonable on it’s face.

      That’s kind of the beauty of Lemmy/Kbin right? You can spin up an instance with whatever rules you want. I think people are reacting to the fact that during the Reddit exodus Beehaw kind of looked like a “default” general instance, including me.

      But that’s a misreading on our part, not them going back on that.

    • BreadDog@kbin.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      2 years ago

      Its both a value add and a negative. For those more focused on their own community (Like beehaw) it’s an obvious positive. But for many users, losing access to certain communities on your own instance of choice is going to be a negative. I personally don’t blame Beehaw for favoring the former. I think improved moderation tools and more granular federation would at least make the move less of a blow to users.

    • Leigh@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 years ago

      Absolutely. It’s disappointing that this person read a post made by the Beehaw admins that was written with nuance and grace, and then decided to respond with vitriol. That’s exactly the kind of attitude that is so prolific on Reddit, and I am happy to leave it behind. Thank you for your reasoned reply.

      OP, I encourage you in the future to choose grace.

      • Ski@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 years ago

        This kind of post right here is the gold standard for why I chose Kbin over other instances. Well reasoned, free of vitriol, and looking to build a new culture outside of the one a lot of us left behind on Reddit.

      • BaroqueInMind@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        Vitriol is a strong word to describe what I said about Beehaw. I do not hold a bitter spite to what Beehaw did, in fact I understand and accept their decision as prudent and appropriate for their community.

        I simply hate how they act benevolent where the reality is the opposite; that their admins are legitimately overlords akin to a full-time power-abusing reddit moderator.

        Regarding your comment that I need to act with more grace, my apologies. You are correct, I should be less aggressive in my opinions and will self-censor henceforth to protect and maintain the humility of the discussions that occur here.

        • Leigh@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          I simply hate how they act benevolent where the reality is the opposite; that their admins are legitimately overlords akin to a full-time power-abusing reddit moderator.

          What do you mean by this? Do you have examples? Maybe you’re correct and I just haven’t seen it, but every example I’ve seen of them responding to something has been great.

          Regarding your comment that I need to act with more grace, my apologies. You are correct, I should be less aggressive in my opinions and will self-censor henceforth to protect and maintain the humility of the discussions that occur here.

          Don’t sweat it, brother. <3

      • eta_aquarid@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        yeah, this is the weird thing; Beehaw’s reasonings are incredibly reasonable, and they’re not saying that the other parts of Lemmy aren’t good enough for them, which is what I think a lot of people are getting mad at

        that and thinking that they’re entitled to access to Beehaw

    • Noki@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 years ago

      100% - the beauty of the fedivers is that everybody can chose to federatre OR NOT!

      If people wanne follow beehaw they can switch server or even go to some other fedivers project and follow from there.

    • eta_aquarid@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Isn’t the whole point of the fediverse that you get to create and craft your experience for your community? There’s a really good reason defederating is a feature. I don’t get it, Beehaw decides to use the features of federation so now we: firstly become tribalistic (them vs us), and secondly decide to get angry? Like it or not, this is what you signed up for when you wanted federation.

      Yes, exactly

      like we’re not owed Beehaw’s cooperation; it’s their instance and if the users want to do this then that’s their perogative

      Regardless, this is being blown out of proportion; Beehaw outright said that this was temporary