silence7@slrpnk.netM to Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.@slrpnk.netEnglish · 9 months agoU.S. Seeks to Boost Nuclear Power After Decades of Inertia | Measures moving through Congress to encourage new reactors are receiving broad bipartisan supportwww.nytimes.comexternal-linkmessage-square35fedilinkarrow-up186arrow-down16cross-posted to: news@lemmy.worldnyt_gift_articles@sopuli.xyz
arrow-up180arrow-down1external-linkU.S. Seeks to Boost Nuclear Power After Decades of Inertia | Measures moving through Congress to encourage new reactors are receiving broad bipartisan supportwww.nytimes.comsilence7@slrpnk.netM to Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.@slrpnk.netEnglish · 9 months agomessage-square35fedilinkcross-posted to: news@lemmy.worldnyt_gift_articles@sopuli.xyz
minus-squareconditional_soup@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up11·9 months agoIt’s not carbon. That’s the biggest thing right now; first and foremost, we need to stop carbon emissions. Nuclear is one pathway there, and there’s no reason it can’t be complimentary to renewables.
minus-squareChurbleyimyam@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up5·9 months agoI agree with you about carbon but nuclear has ended up being one of the most expensive alternatives.
minus-squareDerGottesknecht@feddit.delinkfedilinkarrow-up1·9 months ago Nuclear is one pathway there, and there’s no reason it can’t be complimentary to renewables. The reason is limited resources. Whatever we invest into nuclear can’t be invested in renewables.
It’s not carbon. That’s the biggest thing right now; first and foremost, we need to stop carbon emissions. Nuclear is one pathway there, and there’s no reason it can’t be complimentary to renewables.
I agree with you about carbon but nuclear has ended up being one of the most expensive alternatives.
The reason is limited resources. Whatever we invest into nuclear can’t be invested in renewables.