• SatanicNotMessianic
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    Can you do a text search and find the word “conviction” in the amendment?

    Here’s the text:

    No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may, by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.

    And, again, this has all gone through Congress. Trump did it. Everyone knows it. Even the Trumpists know it.

    • CableMonster
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      And that was in reference to a particular known and agreed on insurrection that occurred. I think they were called the “reconstruction amendments”, and the reason was to get things back going after the civil war.

      • SatanicNotMessianic
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Yup, and the reason for guaranteeing the right to vote regardless of race was also a result of a specific insurrection that occurred.

        I think it’s perfectly fair to say that if someone tried to overthrow the US government, they’re not qualified to be running the US government.

        • CableMonster
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          I think that would be fine if they were convicted of that crime.