• arisunz@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    at the time of writing, this: https://lemmy.blahaj.zone/post/104902 is the top post of 196, and the comments are fucking infested with tankies, it’s kinda scary

    edit: was infested with tankies! i mean there’s still a lot of garbage there but luckily the mods stepped in, thanks y’all, we see u <3

    • mustyOrange@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Ah that makes sense. Didn’t know that thread got that bad.

      People who say left unity is a possibility are as dumb as a box of stumps. It’s always interesting going to a tankie place and seeing people with lgbt flair talk up Putin, as if they wouldn’t be shot on sight.

      • AlexisLuna@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        I can’t understand the queer tankies. Like, do they believe that an explicitly authoritarian regime would suddenly have no need for a maginalized minority to target? Do they believe that they will somehow become the minorty group in power and will be able to target other groups? Or is just like lgbt cons who hope to be “One of the good ones”?

        • nunyunuymi@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          20
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Tankies are almost exclusively western white people who have never in their life experienced living under an authoritarian communist regime. This includes queer tankies.

          • kat@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            14
            ·
            1 year ago

            Parents grew up under authoritarian communism. Their stance is and always has been “social programs rocked, being under that government sucked”. No amount of decent living standards will ever make up for the possibility of imprisonment because you disobeyed the ruling party (and disobeying included things like having the wrong haircut, let alone the wrong gender identity).

            The colour of the uniform is unimportant. The literature is unimportant. The slogans are unimportant. The leader is unimportant. At the end of the day, you’ll still be stuck with a police state telling you how to dress, how to act, how to think, fascist or communist.

      • WhatTrees@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s the same “pick-me” behavior we see with Blaire White and Candace Owens. They either truly think they will be seen as one of the good ones, or they don’t care and just want the power and money that comes with being the token.

        • Lily@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Could you please define leftism and tankies, I’m very interested. Right now it sounds like people are getting called tankies (and getting banned) just for seeing some good things in actual socialist societies.

          • kay@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            “Actual socialist societies” - which ones I wonder?

            Also I like the wordplay of “seeing some good things…”. If someone replies to a post expressing grievance about the holocaust with “but guys hitler provided good childcare benefits” (made up exmp), are they “just seeing some good things”?

            Context matters a bunch and most of the time people saying stuff like that and what you said want to talk about the semantic accuracy of their statement and ignore its context (and the reason they made it), to cry about how they’re being censored for a ‘technically accurate’ statement.

            Literally the same rhetoric the “IDW” uses to appeal to the less intelligent of kids. It’d be embarrassing if it’d worked on you.