• oryx@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 year ago

    This isn’t really news anymore, and it’s not exclusive to Microsoft studios. Many games come to mind, notably GTA/RDR off the top of my head (outside the obvious Bethesda titles, since everyone’s more focused on them right now). GTA is also extremely close to the ten year mark between titles; RDR2 was eight years. These big, open world games have constantly been getting larger and taking more time to make for ages now.

    • LUHG@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I really don’t care if they have a 15 year cycle. Just keep the games fresh and build upon it.

      Use destiny as an example.

    • chickpeaze@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t care as long as the pipeline has enough different good games that I get one per year. I can wait years between games in a franchise as long as there’s something else to play in the interim.

    • tryinghappy@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Honestly as long as the quality remains as high as it is for the Rockstar titles I am okay with it.

    • Repulsa@lemmy.fmhy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      They get larger, have more features, content and better graphics but they don’t seem to be getting any more fun to actually play (to me anyway but that could be ‘old’ setting in)

      • Cryst@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think that’s subjective. While I do agree with you to some extent I think that there are people out there that love these games and they play them for a long long time. Perhaps they are catering to a different crowd.