• Andreas@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Ironic that three people downvoted this. But I agree, a “no downvotes” rule is designed to avoid disagreement and conflict, which is impossible on a public forum without extremely restricted expression. If the point is to be always be nice, why not disable open commenting and make users select their replies from a list of canned positive comments. 100% safety and positivity.

    • LurkyMcLurkface@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m torn on the whole no downvote button thing (I missed that when I signed up), but you can be still nice while having a discussion and disagreeing with people.

      I would argue that the downvote button can lead to exactly what you are describing though, no disagreement or conflict.
      Someone posts a unpopular opinion, a bunch of users downvote it to hell and poof!, no discussion or exchange of ideas. Just out of mind, out of sight.

      • Andreas@feddit.dk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s only true if there is a downvote threshold that automatically hides downvoted comments, which I don’t think Lemmy has implemented. I agree that downvoting can be used to censor and avoid discussion, but the justification for removing downvotes on Beehaw is something like “keeping a positive environment with no negativity from disliking” rather than making sure users have to voice their disagreements and not just smash the blue red arrow like cowards.

        • LurkyMcLurkface@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah, I think we are pretty much in agreement. We will see how the instances without downvoting turns out over time. Thats the beauty of federated services I guess, its just a small part of the whole ecosystem.

      • Gort@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        There are issues with both sides of the down button debate, but I’m more for it than against.

        For a different take on the downvote button, yesterday I put a post up on a technical thread. I hadn’t really read properly what the discussion was about, so my post wasn’t really helpful even if well intentioned. I only noticed when I got a couple of downvotes. I looked again at my post, then at the OP, then realised my error. Eventually I deleted my post. So, in that instance, I found the downvote helpful to myself as well as for the rest of the thread: make sure I read the OP carefully. ;-)

        • LurkyMcLurkface@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          In this case a reply informing you about the missunderstanding would also work. My hope is that one of the people downvoting will take the time to do that when there is no downvote button.