Apparently there’s an issue with some instances banning users for criticizing authoritarian governments. Is lemmy.world a safe place to criticize governments?

  • GarbageShootAlt@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    20
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    You know, I agree that he shouldn’t have collaborated with America’s foreign policy following the sino-soviet split, but I don’t think that even puts him as a major candidate in the running.

    Edit: He also really should have given the sparrow thing a test run, and there are other criticisms to make, but these are still lesser than the original one. There was bad theory and bad practice in the Cultural Revolution, but overwhelmingly its biggest problem was endangering the revolution that Mao led to establish the PRC in the first place, something for which he deserves credit on account of poverty reduction, drastic increase in life expectancy, land-redistribution, etc. Oh yeah, and the whole “opposing Japanese and British colonialism” thing, since the KMT rolled over for that, but hopefully that goes without saying.

      • GarbageShootAlt@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        Thank you for letting me know. I always forget about that because I can see their replies. In any case, I’m more worried about what the people on lemmy.world think, since Beehaw has basically become a purpose-built engine of sectarianism, so the content of those replies would be a foregone conclusion.

        I’ll try to remember to use my lemmy.ml account in the future for this.

        • nephs@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          1 year ago

          Only if you really want them to read it. I appreciate it’s important to talk to the general audience. :)

          • GarbageShootAlt@lemmygrad.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            17
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            1 year ago

            Ha, fair question! They have plenty of people they dislike, but what I was trying to refer to was their opposition to what they call “tankies” and I call “People who believe that the US lies about its enemies, particularly its big geopolitical rivals.” Specifically, while they are conversationally annoying about it, what really bugs me is their campaign to defederate and get others to defederate from spaces they deem “tankie-friendly”. I think that really undermines the platform as a whole to pillarize things that way (i.e. closing things off into silos).

            “Sectarianism” arguably isn’t the right word for that (it has intra-ideology connotations), but I didn’t think it was worth splitting hairs over.

    • Dapado
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      It seems like you’ve left out the part where multiple tens of millions of people died as a result of his policies.