What stood out to me is how bad the Ally can be in certain games when not plugged in. 1% and. 1% lows that are worse than either of the decks.
The best thing about the old deck (other than the screen) is battery life. In Dead Cells it beat the lcd decks 6 hours with 8 hours of battery life while running at 90 fps instead of 60 (the ally lasted 2-3 hours depending on refresh rate). Obviously this is not a very gpu heavy scenario but still significant in my opinion.
deleted by creator
What stood out to me is how bad the Ally can be in certain games when not plugged in. 1% and. 1% lows that are worse than either of the decks. The best thing about the old deck (other than the screen) is battery life. In Dead Cells it beat the lcd decks 6 hours with 8 hours of battery life while running at 90 fps instead of 60 (the ally lasted 2-3 hours depending on refresh rate). Obviously this is not a very gpu heavy scenario but still significant in my opinion.
deleted by creator
Removed by mod
thanks for the wall of misinformation :p
The testing was primarily focussed around OLED vs LCD models of the steam deck.
The Asus was only included to give some context of the competition.
It also talks about improved thermals between oled and lcd, the improved redesign, and stuff that isnt relevant/applicable to tge asus.
The AI summary completely misses this, and assumes its all a direct comparison between 2 competitors, and lists only the sections relevant to this
Thank you for making Cunningham’s Law a reality.
I wonder if you would have made that post without it.
Seeing as you didn’t answer the person that asked for the info, it seems clear.