Image description: penis shaped prints in snow from a hopping animal


(Originally published on ohai.social: 2024-02-23)

  • Turun@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    9 months ago

    Thank you. How the fuck was this unanswered for ten hours?

    When a rabbit runs they place their front paws next to each other (the “balls” in the image) and their hind legs are placed in front and in-between their front paws. Because the hind paws are so long and the rabbit is running at high speed they leave a long impression in the snow (the “shaft” in the image). The rabbit was running away from our point of view.

    • freamon@endlesstalk.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      9 months ago

      How the fuck was this unanswered for ten hours?

      At the risk of doing the same thing: because it was never really a question.

      • Turun@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Then the title must have been changed

        Um… anyone know what kind of animal left these prints in the snow?

        Seems pretty explicit to me. In addition to that, the other comments suggest that this is not common knowledge (a wallaby? Something hopping with a tail?), so I don’t think the title was intended to be a rhetorical question only.

        • freamon@endlesstalk.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          9 months ago

          The title here is the same as it as on Mastodon. The ALT text for the picture is displayed as ‘Image Description’ in the body of the Lemmy post. As that states, the prints being from a hopping animal has already been guessed. The OP is called ‘Meanwhile in Canada’, indicating that it’s an account for the non-serious side of Canadian life, and that it was always very unlikely going to be a wallaby (pretty much native to Australasia only).

          The thing is: no-one really cares what the animal actually is - the photo has been posted because the prints look a bit like a penis. It’s a jokey question, for which the appropriate response is a jokey answer. Anyone trying to factually identify the animal is being way too literal, and somewhat missing the point.