• rglullis@communick.news
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      I mean as a non-admin. Users on Mastodon are at the mercy of the instance owner. On Bluesky (and nostr) they are not.

      • CaptainSpaceman@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Then users need to spin up their own instance, right? Then all their posts stay backed up if they choose?

        Seems like a mediocre problem to get bent out of shape enough to move to a centralized platform.

        • rglullis@communick.news
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          1 year ago

          No. A better analogy would be like phone number portability. You can “own” your number, and if you want to change your company you can take the number with you.

        • s0ckpuppet@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          Completely impractical for most people but this advice gets unironically thrown around all the time. And evangelists still wonder why regular people think the fediverse and particularly Mastodon are convoluted af.

          • hansl@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            I think people are confusing centralized with federated. Federation has benefits but Mastodon is not decentralized. There is duplication of data but it’s not the same.