Please check my post, I think everything I said is very valid, but I want this community to see it too, and help steer the discussion, I think reddit is doing this intentionally.

  • Communist@beehaw.orgOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    The problem with tankies has nothing to do with communism, i’m a communist, that’s not the problem at all.

    The problem with tankies is that they’re authoritarian genocide deniers. The GPL doesn’t have any authoritarianism or genocide denial in it.

    The LEAD DEV denies the genocide Uyghurs in china. It’s much worse than you’re assuming.

    • th3raid0r@tucson.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah! Definitely, I understand that! But in my neck of the woods “tankies” are more just boogeymen that people throw around when they want to cast an entire group as immoral. It’s not that they don’t exist, but they aren’t gaining power either. It just seems like an appeal to fear (a reasonable one at that), but using illogical framing that doesn’t at all represent reality. That’s the fundemental crux of it for me. It may come to bite me in the future too! Growing up in conservative parts in the U.S. I’ve grown numb to people claiming others are communists - it comes across as more a technique for division than any real concern of community harm.

      I’m not trying be an apologist for the devs opinions or detract from them as much as I’m trying to state that open source, and this project - given its git history - doesn’t appear to spread authoritarianism. I didn’t sign an agreement to violently seize the means of production upon cloning the repository. Had this information not been swirling around on reddit (and now lemmy) I would’ve never known that I had to “cancel” yet another thing.

      I mean, personally, I’d rather fork it and make it into a vision that the people of Tucson want in their social media experience. Lemmy is a bit better architected, and I think the codebase is a bit more mature for such thing.

      • Communist@beehaw.orgOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yes, I agree that lemmy doesn’t have any politics injected into the code, and that’s why i’m on lemmy, but the devs are definitely politically fucked up.

      • beets@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        See from my own neck of the woods, ‘tankies’ describes something with actual power, albeit very minor and entirely online. I’ve seen a shocking amount of online leftist communities infiltrated and taken over by them, with real earnest critiques about housing prices and wealth inequality diluted by worship of whichever anti-US dictator has caught their attention today. They’ll suck all the air out of the room, ban dissenters as ‘libs’, and then using the excuse “No Punching Left” remove criticisms of their weird ass views about Kim Jong-un and Putin.

        I get that this might not be a widespread usage, but in left leaning online spaces it’s a useful descriptor just because it keeps fucking happening and it actively shits up whichever community it happens to. I wish they were fucking boogeymen, honestly.

        The fear, I guess, is that given how many there already are in lemmy, they might pre-emptively poison the well in some way.

        • th3raid0r@tucson.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah, that tracks. I’ll grant you that there are those left spaces on reddit that can get really tankie really quickly. (I don’t go to the ones in the fediverse - might eventually lurk tho with a critical mind of course).

          I just find myself dismissing them pretty easily and making my own space. Left politics got really weird and counterproductive, so I found /r/TraumaAndPolitics and made that a small space that had some pretty interesting leftist conversation through a language of trauma. (I had made /r/TraumaInformedPolicy, but only found /r/TraumaAndPolitics a few days later, but we made the subs around the same time, oddly enough).

          I suppose I shouldn’t dismiss the experiences of those who stayed at the expense of authoritarian communist propaganda and have likely been damaged in some way because of it.

          It’s just that I find this fear counterproductive when it comes to building communities, if we’re betting that most people aren’t going to like Authoritarian Communisim (and that’s a damn good bet) then the idea is to get as many people into the community as possible as fast as possible.

          I have some on-the-ground ideas that I’ll experiment with for tucson.social and report back when we see how that works.

    • aMalayali@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      genocide Uyghurs in china

      As a person who hasn’t really looked up the issue(I mean I have read about it on the net here n there, but have never dived into the issue deeply), I have seen people talking about it on both sides and I’m confused.
      The main things I’m hearing from people who say that a genocide isn’t happening are:

      • That it’s their suppression of religion expressions being public and that people are not being genocided, but public religious expression is not greatly provided by China. That it’s similar to the stereotypes created against muslims after events like the World trade centre attack and it’s being exaggerated as genocide.
      • That it’s just propaganda seen on English speaking forums to deface the other side and if an actual genocide was happening, the countries in Asia itself would be taking action and talking about it and currently only western countries who’re far away are talking about it the most. One side claims that it’s Western or Capitalist propagnada aimed to defame and the opposite side says that it’s Chinese or Communist propaganda aimed to whitewash.

      Most of the times I’ve seen it, both sides accuse each other of being blinded by propaganda and the convo devolves there.

      Which side is actually right here?