• Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    Coordination is essential to any military action. The better you can coordinate your actions, the greater the objectives you can achieve.

    When your ability to coordinate is limited to the distance that people can hear a drum or a trumpet, you’re not capable of coordinating across any area larger than a few city blocks. You’re a sitting duck against any massed troops, unless you also mass enough troops to stop them from marching right through you.

    Small unit tactics are largely ineffective against massed troops until the invention of the telegraph, 30-40 years after the revolution.

    • niktemadur@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Then there was wireless, and that makes me think of the French or Dutch Resistance during WWII - units of even just one individual.

      • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        Yep. Trench warfare was a thing because effective communication was only possible through wires, and wires required fixed locations. Defense could be effectively coordinated, but advancing more than a couple thousand yards put attackers out of communication with commanders.

        People like to argue that armored vehicles put an end to trench warfare, but it wasn’t really the armor or the vehicle. It was the radio carried inside those vehicles that allowed units to coordinate their attacks.

    • rambaroo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      They didn’t use guerrilla tactics against massed formations. They used them against the British supply lines, and they were effective at it.