Previously LGPL, now re-licensed as closed-source/commercial. Previous code taken down.

Commercial users pay $99/year, free for personal use but each user has to make a free account after a trial period.

  • Kayn@dormi.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    10 months ago

    How else do you expect their time to be paid for?

    Donations?

    • MadhuGururajan@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      10 months ago

      Hey, A lot of people spent their precious free time to look at your project, test it out, and talking about it to their colleagues. How are you going to pay us for wasting however many minutes or hours of time spent on your supposedly open source project before you did the bait-and-switch?

      (By “you” I meant the developer.)

    • MadhuGururajan@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      Donations can give you hobby money. Not “multi-millionaire, going to retire” money. If people who start FOSS projects don’t want to admit that, then they are just looking for free popularity/shortcut to success. They can stop abusing the FLOSS community just so they can make a quick buck.

    • bmaxv@noc.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      @HKayn This may sound cold hearted and I swear I’m not:

      There is no obligation for the world in general to pay someone for open source software. (right now)

      Everyone should think long hard about writing software and donating time and effort because of this.

      I don’t like this state of things, I would prefer some kind of “general usefulness” tax financed grant thing.

      • Kayn@dormi.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        10 months ago

        And this is exactly why the dev of PySimpleGUI did what they did.

        Whether they have a business case will depend on what happens on those forks. Will they be as maintained as the original was?

    • MadhuGururajan@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      It’s quite entitled and dishonest to expect free beta-testing, marketing, and clout from the use of FOSS as a shortcut for your product.

      If you are sincere then you should know what you are getting into when you create that license.txt with LGPL terms on it.

      • Kayn@dormi.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        It’s quite entitled and dishonest to expect free beta-testing, marketing, and clout from the use of FOSS as a shortcut for your product.

        Either show us where they voiced this expectation, or stop talking out of your ass.

        • MadhuGururajan@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          10 months ago

          The entire FOSS community works for very little compensation. You’re not special. Read the fucking room. A lot of people spend their free time building cool shit to share with the community. You’re a prick if you think that you’re in the right calling people in the FOSS community entitled.

          • Kayn@dormi.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            Everyone can see your mental state degenerate in real time. You’re unable to stop yourself from flinging insults with every comment you type, be it here or in the other thread where you’re currently losing a debate.