• LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    The strength of Bernie in the general election remains an unproven hypothesis. But I agree that the DNC behaved inappropriately. The nature of primaries as “private” elections controlled by the party makes this type of behavior fairly inevitable.

    Though the RNC also tried to stop Trump, they just failed at it, so parties don’t necessarily have complete control over the outcome.

    • winterayars@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      He was polling ahead of Trump, Clinton was polling behind. We don’t know if that would’ve continued to the actual election but we do know that Clinton lost.

      • LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 months ago

        I largely agree with this. I think there are good reasons to think the race would tighten—Bernie was never subjected to republican attack ads, and I think he also benefited from Clinton’s unpopularity, an effect that might fade once she was out of the race. But you’re right that we’ll never know for sure what would have happened.

        • Ulvain@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          Idk, I feel like Republican attack ads on Bernie would have done what Democratic attack ads on Trump did: electrify his base. “HE WANTS EVERYONE TO HAVE EDUCATION FOR FREE!!!” damn, well, sign me up!

          I know there would have been calls of “communist” ad nauseam, but idk that it has the horrible effect it once had - if anything it might have energized youth vote…

          Idk