Some form of brain injury could be behind the symptoms reported by those with long COVID, according to a new study, and adapting tests and treatments to match could aid progress in tackling the condition.

Analyzing 203 patients hospitalized with COVID-19 or its associated symptoms, and comparing the results with 60 people without the infection, researchers noticed elevated levels of four brain injury biomarkers – key signs of biological change – in those infected with COVID-19.

What’s more, two of those signs of brain injury persisted into the recovery phase, suggesting that they continue even after the COVID-19 infection has gone. Levels of these two biomarkers were even higher for people who also experienced neurological complications with COVID-19.

  • Freshfrozenplasma@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    9 months ago

    In 2020 during COVID, it often presented strangely with patients on 100% oxygen, no respiratory distress, but still having low O2 sats. They’d sit there for a week and a half with sats in the 70s and were only intubated once they decompensated from there. That 10 or so days of low sats hits every organ in the body but the consensus was to intubate once they were in distress. For those that survived, long covid makes a lot of sense

    • pearsaltchocolatebar@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      I got long covid after what was the equivalent of a bad cold. My o2 never dropped below 95%, and my temp never got above 101F.

      I’m definitely not the only one, so oxygen deprivation isn’t the only source of damage.

  • neuropean@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    51
    ·
    9 months ago

    Yes, because of course that explains the lung capacity issues. /s

    I hate when issues are oversimplified beyond anything meaningful like this on the back of some newly published article.

    • Waldowal@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      I get what you’re saying. Without more context that this finding is one piece of a bigger puzzle, you can look forward to your Aunt Crazytown confidently informing you at next Thanksgiving dinner that you can’t breath well because you have a brain injury. It’s 50% a lack of journalistic probing, and 50% all the lead paint the Boomers ate growing up.

      • neuropean@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        That’s exactly it, long COVID is multiple problems in many damaged tissues. We’ve found a new damaged location, it doesn’t diminish the impact of everywhere else though like this article headline claims.

        • Suspiciousbrowsing@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          But that’s not how research works… research papers will often assess one very specific area… there’s no point in talking about all of the other ailments that are possible with Covid, because the research paper was exploring brain injury biomarkers ?

          • Waldowal@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            9 months ago

            Eh, he’s not commenting on the research though. He’s commenting on the article. The headline says “Long COVID seems to be brain injury…”, but we know that can’t be the whole story. If the journalist were doing a better job, it should have said “Long COVID likely involves a brain injury…”. They might have even asked the researchers how the brain injury theory could account for diminished lung capacity - but they didn’t.

      • neuropean@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        9 months ago

        Attributing long COVID to a brain injury is just wrong. Long COVID is the result of multiple damaged organs, including lungs, peripheral and central nervous systems, the heart, etc.

        What’s worse, this is entirely correlative. Bio markers are correlative indicators of disease, and while sometimes there is a causal relationship that is something that must be tested and proven before you can make the claim that it’s the source of the issue.

        If long COVID correlates with brain injuries and certain elevated bio markers, it could very well be an artifact of reaching a high viral burden during peak infection. The immune system couldn’t prevent damage to the brain during a period of time, for example. It makes sense that if the immune system couldn’t prevent damage during this time, that the lungs were getting ravaged because the immune system couldn’t mount an effective defense in the tissue.

        There are so many possibilities that are glossed over by a simplified headline like this and worse, it will stick in people’s minds that have no idea how complex the situation really is.