RandAlThor@lemmy.ca to World News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 9 months agoChina set to lose 60 percent of population by century's endwww.newsweek.comexternal-linkmessage-square46fedilinkarrow-up1189arrow-down118cross-posted to: worldnews
arrow-up1171arrow-down1external-linkChina set to lose 60 percent of population by century's endwww.newsweek.comRandAlThor@lemmy.ca to World News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 9 months agomessage-square46fedilinkcross-posted to: worldnews
minus-squareLinkerbaan@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down1·9 months agoThis is such a dumb myth. The problem is that we refuse to embrace green energy, not that there’s too many people. If the oil lobby didn’t block all progress this would have been solved long ago.
minus-squareskulblaka@startrek.websitelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·9 months agoEnergy isn’t our only limited resource.
minus-squareLinkerbaan@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·9 months agoA few top% people in the world (mostly western countries) are responsible for the majority of emissions We throw away a billion more times food than we really consume too. And we just dump everything we don’t like into the ocean Everything is a distribution problem, not an availability problem.
This is such a dumb myth. The problem is that we refuse to embrace green energy, not that there’s too many people.
If the oil lobby didn’t block all progress this would have been solved long ago.
Energy isn’t our only limited resource.
A few top% people in the world (mostly western countries) are responsible for the majority of emissions
We throw away a billion more times food than we really consume too. And we just dump everything we don’t like into the ocean
Everything is a distribution problem, not an availability problem.