• Corngood
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    9 months ago

    …computers that are locked down like game consoles, if they have their way.

    • mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      They won’t. Windows isn’t even the best way to play Windows games, anymore. x86 itself might become a suggestion - a legacy bytecode for LLVM to consume.

      • Corngood
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 months ago

        I do agree with you. The current state of things is pretty great.

        I have a phone, laptop, desktop, and steam deck. I control the software that runs on all of them, at least down to the bootloader/kernel. If I want to patch a kernel, I can do it. And aside from the phone, I can probably run the majority of the games that have ever been released (on any platform), on any of them.

        I worry about two things in the future:

        1. Will be able to buy modern hardware without the software it runs being restricted?

        2. Will online services used by software be accessible without hardware based attestation?

        • M500
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          I have similar worries. I think there will always be some kind of free hardware, but it might be limited to slower arm or risc-v chips. But I doubt there will even be a situation where you can’t have control.

          Your second point is not something I’ve considered, but now I’m worried about it and can totally see that being a thing.

        • mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          More services I don’t give a shit about would not be surprising.

          But a lot of these problems have an obvious answer in legislation.