• EinatYahav@lemmy.todayOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    58
    ·
    9 months ago

    Both parties are against cannibalism, I’m pretty sure. Both parties are equally susceptible to hoaxes.

      • awesomesauce309@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        9 months ago

        One party in particular benefits more from making those non issues into dog and pony shows. The bullshit asymmetry principle.

    • Feathercrown@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      35
      ·
      9 months ago

      No they aren’t equally susceptible to hoaxes, and you can tell that’s true because I can predict which party she’s from.

      • perishthethought@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        9 months ago

        Rep. Heather Scott, a Republican, introduced a bill that would expand the state’s existing criminal cannibalism law to prohibit any person from “willfully provid[ing] the flesh or blood of a human being to another person to ingest without such person’s knowledge or consent.”

    • AbidanYre@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      What’s the democratic equivalent of this? Or kitty litter in schools? Or any of the Q nonsense?

    • grabyourmotherskeys@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      If Biden made an anti-cannabalism speech, R’s would be coming out for it in hours. And don’t forget how Russia is totally cool with cannabalism for that tip of the hat to the far right.