• voodooattack@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Yet they both committed atrocities (torture, murder, rape and god knows what else) and only one is being hailed as “explorer”.

    Edit: I’m not saying we should hail Genghis Khan as an explorer, I’m saying that Christopher Columbus should be deplored as a murderer and a marauder, not praised as an explorer.

    • TheControlled@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      35
      ·
      9 months ago

      Being a murderer and explorer are not mutually exclusive. If ChatGPT said “Murderer” one might presume that he was simply a local killer, captured by the law, and convicted a la Ted Bundy. Explorer is a more appropriate title for Columbus, like “Dictator” is likely more appropriate than “Murderer” for Hitler. Murderer, sadly, is too commonplace for people of their evil.

    • june@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      Why do we assume ‘explorer’ has a positive moral implication?

      To me, looking through all of history, exploration has largely been a net negative to humanity. Modern day exploration isn’t terribly far off. The more we explore the ocean the more we strip it of resources. The more we explore space the more we look to exploit it for wealth.

      Explorers are enablers of worse people at best.