• ch00f@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    Input rate of 3200000 with a decimation of 64 giving me 50ksps. The signal in this case is a NOAA satellite APT which is weak because I found out my antenna wasn’t tuned correctly. I got a much stronger image today, but I still got a few dips like before. Qualitatively, they made the signal sound noisier, but they don’t seem to correspond to any bad sections of the resulting image. Maybe the signal was strong enough to overcome.

    Can you give more details about pager signals? I’ve heard that term before, but I don’t know what it means.

    Also, thanks for responding! the SDR community is pretty small, so I appreciate you taking the time.

    • Thomas Douwes@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      btw, unless you have a very specific USB controller, anything above 2.4MHz sample rate will drop samples and ruin the APT image.
      I guess you already figured the pagers out the from the other comment, but you can find details on sigid wiki

      • ch00f@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        I’ve gotten two APT images come in clear so far with that sample rate. Here’s this morning.

        Do you know what an image ruined by lost samples would look like?

        • Thomas Douwes@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          Those look fine to me, maybe your USB controller is OK? Also might just not be visible. It is more apparent with digital signals like LRPT than APT. I would recommend switching to 2.4MHz sample rate though, nothing in the 137MHz band needs that much bandwidth, and the SNR gain of decimating from 3.2MHz won’t make a difference in that band either.

          I’ve not tried using a high samplerate with APT, but here is one with sample drops for a different reason:

          They are the little mismatched lines in the middle, they are more obvious when you disable syncing:

          • ch00f@lemmy.worldOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            10 months ago

            It’s a USB3 port and I think the only peripheral on the bus, so I guess I’m lucky. Thanks for the examples. I’ll keep an eye out for those.

            As far as your point about the SNR is that because oversampling only reduces read noise, but can’t actually reduce the noise present in the air? (Been a ham for 9 years, but still new to SDR)

            • Thomas Douwes@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              The USB3 won’t make a difference. It’s actually a hardware issue with the rtl2832u in the SDR that causes the drop. I’m not sure why one controller is OK, but that’s what I’ve heard.

              I’ll be honest that I don’t really understand why oversampling helps. But as far as I know it only increases the dynamic range, and if you don’t have a large difference between the weakest and strongest signals you are receiving there isn’t any benefit. And also, yeah, the environmental noise is probably way higher that the ADC noise.

              If you’ve been a ham for 9 years, you probably know more about this than me. I’ve been into radio/SDR for about 1.5 years now, and I’ve mostly just done satellite stuff in that time.