Another CEO for mozilla. Good or bad news?

  • EdibleFriend@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    57
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    I’ve known Mozilla being great wouldn’t last forever, and there it is. Someone from those companies at the helm? Here comes the enshitification.

    • treadful@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Hard to say. You kind of want someone that was part of a successful product. And successful for-profit products are almost always menaces.

      • Zorque@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        9 months ago

        Yes, but hiring someone who’s good at making for-profit “services” successful generally means you want your product to be for-profit.

        And as you say, successful for-profit companies are often menaces.

      • EdibleFriend@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Would you call any of those successful products ‘good’ tho? Yes they have made a lot of money but at the same time…2 of 3 are straight up evil. Ebay…eh. Could be worse. Thats the best I can say for them. Paypal has straight up stolen people’s money on countless occasions and gotten away with it. Then there was that huge violin fiasco. Airbnb is flat out a part of destroying the housing market, they know this, they don’t care.

        I get it, most big companies are ‘menaces’ like you say but…these are absolutely horrible companies responsible for true evil and, odds are, he’s going to bring that energy to Mozilla.

        • treadful@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          I don’t really disagree, but what do you want as an organization, someone that built a “good” product that nobody ever used and fell into obscurity? Or someone that built a product that attracted and retained millions of users that you might consider “bad”? And tbh, most of the “bad” from these products is just because of their size and monopoly, which would arguably be a good problem to have for Mozilla.

          Probably an easy choice if I was on the board.

          Also, not that it matters to our discussion but just as a minor correction, the new CEO is a woman.

        • iopq@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          11
          ·
          9 months ago

          Airbnb actually provides a useful service, unlike PayPal which only extracts fees

            • iopq@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              Didn’t say that, I’m comparing companies that do nothing useful to companies that do something useful

                  • EdibleFriend@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    9 months ago

                    No, but you are bringing up the merrits of an equally evil company and said thiet success is a sign of why they should be at the helm. I’m just trying to understand this.

          • Zorque@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            9 months ago

            Giving an avenue for rich development companies to snatch up properties they can short-term rent to rich travelers is a useful service?

              • Zorque@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                9 months ago

                Assuning thats normally for hotels and such, not as easily, no. AirBnB’s specific purpose is to remove barriers of entry for hosting people in your property. Initially that meant renting one of your rooms to a traveler on the cheap. Now it means companies that would otherwise have to jump through tons of regulatory hoops to put their properties on booking sites.

                Not to mention… even if its the same, then its the same and still not a useful service, yeah? It’s just another booking service. Which, coincidentally, mostly extracts fees.

    • interdimensionalmeme
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      We can version freeze forever. Anything that won’t work in 2023 firefox is probably trash anyway.

      • netburnr@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        9 months ago

        So you can’t. There are cert stores, new protocols and ciphers, and eventually u patched zero days.

        I know this because I’ve been playing with a g3 powerboat and all the browsers at this point are no longer maintained to support the above things as of last year. The last person working on it gave up

        • interdimensionalmeme
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          Not much of problem. Run in a VM, disable certificate validation. Html5 and javascript is still going to last a long long time. Anything that can’t run with that is soydev shit and you don’t need it.

      • LibreFish@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Called palemoon, except version freeze is much older.

        Anything else will goatsy your computer to all forms of zero days.