• Wogi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    74
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    The previous comment is more like shorthand, rather than literal truth.

    It’s faster to say piracy isn’t stealing if purchasing isn’t ownership than it is to say “if a company can simply reverse a permanent access license at any time then pirating media from them is perfectly ethical and should not be considered a crime”

    • null@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      31
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      It’s bad shorthand though. In this context, there was never any “buying content” happening, nor was piracy ever “stealing”. It’s just misrepresentation of both sides.

      • T0RB1T@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        32
        ·
        9 months ago

        That’s fair, but I feel like the point is that many people go through a process where

        1. You pay money
        2. The buttons on your screen say “buy” “purchase” “check-out” or something else to that effect

        That feels like buying media, so according to the common “consumer” (hate that word) brain, you are spending money to buy content.

        At the same time, media corps have been trying to teach us for years that piracy is exactly the same as stealing.

        The whole point of the shorthand is to explain that these are not facts, they’re misconceptions, AND both of these misconceptions exist for the same reason, corporate propaganda.

          • Wogi@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            12
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            9 months ago

            Because you’re removed about it. Either there’s a better way to express the precise picture you’re describing, or your central argument is fundamentally flawed, and it’s an effective shorthand.

            Sure, there’s nuance. Shorthand is used to convey a nuanced thought quickly. That’s literally the point.

            • null@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              13
              ·
              9 months ago

              Lol “removed” about it.

              Weird logic. Pointing out something that isn’t accurate but gets parroted anyways means I need to come up with a better thing to parrot.

              • Zoolander@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                10
                ·
                9 months ago

                There’s no logic here. You’re right and they’re just throwing a tantrum because it means they’re wrong.

                • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  I am not sure of all the posters here, you would want to mention “throwing a tantrum” in regards to being wrong. But hey I for one am a fan of your posts, it has been fun reading.

                  • Zoolander@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    3
                    ·
                    9 months ago

                    I don’t see anywhere that I’ve thrown a tantrum. I’ve been civil and respectful of all the people replying to me, even when they haven’t returned that in kind, and even attempted to bring some replies back to civility when I felt like the person was arguing in earnest. My point stands and no one has really argued the actual point without contradicting themselves.