• pitninja
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I predict a lot of PGA golfers who’d held out from joining LIV will now reconsider (assuming LIV continues to maintain their branding and product). If I had more skin in the game as a fan, I might have stronger opinions on the deal. (I’m the most casual of casual golf fans).

      • pitninja
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I guess I figured there could still be somewhat separate financing and I’m not sure we have a clear picture on the business structure yet. If they’re still ran as distinct entities within the same organization, I could see some golfers not wanting to take Saudi money 🤷

        • aedyr@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Unfortunately I think it would be a distinction without a difference at this point. LIV/Saudi is buying into a combined org overseen by a single board. From what I’ve read, the PGA will have more seats, but the chair will be Saudi.

          • alyaza [they/she]@beehaw.orgOPM
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            the degree of sportswashing that Saudi Arabia (and to a lesser extent the other theocratic oil petrostates) has pulled off in the past few years really, to me, demonstrates how… i dunno… far off the mark (for lack of a better wording) the moral panic about China’s influence in the global economy is generally? in a lot of ways these governments are worse, but there’s been generously 1/1000th the outrage about how impossible they’ve made it for someone to actually divest from things they own. often it falls to fans and individuals to drum up outrage–and like, that’s not gonna work here, lol. they don’t care.