In other news: water is wet. I think we all knew that Charles wouldn’t have to go through the same pains us common British folk do in regards to accessing healthcare. But nonetheless I think it’s important to continue to highlight these ever growing class divisions in the UK, such as those between people who can afford private healthcare and people who have to rely on our public services. People in positions of authority and power in our country do not understand the struggles of everyday British people.


My TL;DR:

Charles is already receiving expert care for his cancer within days of diagnosis. His speedy treatment should draw fresh attention to the long cancer treatment waiting times that most British people experience with the NHS.

The proportion of patients in England waiting less than 62 days from an urgent suspected cancer referral or consultant upgrade to their first definitive treatment for cancer is 65.2%.

Amid growing frustration at NHS waiting lists, record numbers of people are paying for private healthcare. Nearly 300,000 people in the UK have paid for chemotherapy in the last five years.

Survival rates for cancer in the UK lag behind those of other European countries for nine out of 10 of the most common types of the disease.

Researchers said cancer waiting times across the country were among the worst on record, too many cancers were diagnosed at a late stage, and access to treatment was unequal.

Buckingham Palace has not specified whether the king is receiving private healthcare or being treated on the National Health Service.

  • scholar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Head of State: Receives treatment for cancer

    Everyone else: Angry

    It’s all very well going on about the widening wealth divide, the head of state is going to get priority treatment no matter how long or short the waiting lists are

      • scholar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        5 months ago

        I agree that it would be better if the NHS was able to treat everyone with the same response that the King has received. I just don’t see what this has to do with anything: If he had decided to use the NHS and get the normal waiting time the system would be just as broken.

    • Grimy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Are we going to pretend he isn’t head of state because of the womb he came out of?

      “The monarch, because of his blood lineage, will get priority treatment no matter how long or short the peasant waiting lists are” doesn’t have the same ring.

      • scholar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        5 months ago

        Are we going to pretend that any other form of head of state wouldn’t also get priority treatment?

        • Altair@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          If the country had an actually decent head of state I doubt many would be mad at this.

          Of course, then there wouldn’t be a waiting time for people to get mad at in the first place.

    • Supervisor194@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      5 months ago

      It’s not even about him, they bury this in a story about class struggle so they can repeat the narrative that the NHS is “in crisis,” as if it just magically happens and not because politicians are purposefully crippling it.

    • sugartits@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      the head of state is going to get priority treatment no matter how long or short the waiting lists are

      Yes, that’s the problem…