• theinspectorst@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Yes, my point was that above-inflation budget increases (so real-terms budget increases) ought to have led to improving services, other things being equal. But other things aren’t equal - partly because people are getting older, but also partly because people are living unhealthier lives.

    So just to stand still, the NHS would have needed even larger above-inflation spending hikes than it got; or, heaven forbid, government policy would have had to start treating mass obesity as the public health emergency that it is, rather than fretting about the Tory press calling this a ‘nanny state’…

    • ThenThreeMore@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Yeah which is why the NHS was better under labour, because it was constantly more than 4% above inflation.

      A big part of the killer though is the second part. Yeah the overall budget was (barely) above inflation, but the wage cap was often below inflation. During the time Labour were in power the amount of nurses went up by around 80,000. Since the Tories took power over 200,000 have quit. We can only imagine how many fewer would have left if it weren’t for the 1% pay cap and Brexit.