Zen@biglemmowski.win to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-210 months agoHow bad are search results? Let's compare Google, Bing, Marginalia, Kagi, Mwmbl, and ChatGPTdanluu.comexternal-linkmessage-square49fedilinkarrow-up1158arrow-down132file-textcross-posted to: technology@beehaw.orghackernews@lemmy.smeargle.fanshackernews@derp.foo
arrow-up1126arrow-down1external-linkHow bad are search results? Let's compare Google, Bing, Marginalia, Kagi, Mwmbl, and ChatGPTdanluu.comZen@biglemmowski.win to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-210 months agomessage-square49fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: technology@beehaw.orghackernews@lemmy.smeargle.fanshackernews@derp.foo
I find it pretty interesting that kagi is rated as Terrible search engine, even ChatGPT preforms better.
minus-squareakrot@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·10 months agoBut basing a recommendation on a ballpark anectdotal evidence is eidiculous.
minus-squarecyruseuroslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·10 months agoDid he actually recommend one? That said, it’s obvious the author favors Marginalia personally, but there’s no point pretending they don’t have biases. At least for me, making them obvious helps.
But basing a recommendation on a ballpark anectdotal evidence is eidiculous.
Did he actually recommend one? That said, it’s obvious the author favors Marginalia personally, but there’s no point pretending they don’t have biases. At least for me, making them obvious helps.