Tight labor markets have raised concerns about the role of labor costs in persistently high inflation readings. Policymakers are paying particular attention to nonhousing services inflation, which is considered most closely linked to wages. Analysis shows that higher labor costs are passed along to customers in the form of higher nonhousing services prices, however the effect on overall inflation is very small. Labor-cost growth has no meaningful effect on goods or housing services inflation. Overall, labor-cost growth is responsible for only about 0.1 percentage point of recent core PCE inflation.
Do you listen to Planet Money? They’ve got a recent episode that talks about wage vs profit driven inflation. It’s kinda interesting to hear about how even economists aren’t immune to just repeating the standard line without looking at the data. The tide is starting to turn on opinions about this last round of inflation, and the researcher they interview draws direct lines to the post-WW2 economy.
I mostly listen to Bloomberg’s finance podcasts. Stephanomics, Odd Lots, etc. Really good content there. I think Planet Money has lost its way a little with in-depth analysis.
FWIW I’m not so sure I believe if economists who in the current day primarily focus on depressing wages as a way to break the inflationary spiral are doing so entirely objectively. A large number of these economists are in the employ of companies who benefit from capital vs labor, and would they argue against their own interests?
If this makes me sound like far left wing, I am not really. But I am also not blind to conscious and unconscious bias in commentary.