• abhibeckert@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    I’m not suggesting they be banned

    Yes you are - most of them get at least half their funding from the government. They couldn’t possibly stay open.

    And they can’t “fund their damn selves”. They are funded by parents. Parents can’t afford that (at least, not enough to fill a school).

    • Zagorath@aussie.zoneOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      10 months ago

      They couldn’t possibly stay open

      Then perhaps they shouldn’t. Private companies shouldn’t be getting over half their funding from the government. An unprofitable business shouldn’t exist. Let the far more efficient state school system take over.

    • Quokka@quokk.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      10 months ago

      If we’re going to spend public money on schools, it should be on public schools.

    • jonne@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      10 months ago

      They can transition to being public schools if they want to continue getting public funds. I don’t understand why there’s been this global trend of governments just shoveling money to the private sector without any oversight or conditions.

      I mean, I do know why it’s like that, I just don’t understand why the public’s been going along with it for so long.

      • Fleur__@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        I agree on the fuck private schools sentiment but there is a lot of oversight and conditions for private schools.

      • assassinatedbyCIA@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        The rich demand it because they save money paying for their essential over paying tax. Basically the cost of essentials do not scale at the same rate as rises in income or wealth. Therefore the rich pay proportionally less of their income on essentials than the poor. Therefore any cost at the point of service for essentials is effectively a regressive tax. It’s why the rich love things like GST as well.

        • jonne@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          The rich also run the companies that get all those sweetheart contracts and subsidies. They pretend they’re libertarians, but pretty much every billionaire made their fortune because they got a real nice government contract, usually something involving a monopoly that should’ve always been a public resource to begin with.

    • billytheid@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      so what? Why is public money being spend to fund religious extremism? You want to make your child a maladjusted head case, pay for it yourself