Missiles could be placed at RAF Lakenheath in Suffolk in case of potential war between Nato and Russia
The US is planning to station nuclear weapons in the UK for the first time in 15 years amid a growing threat from Russia, according to a report. Warheads three times as strong as the Hiroshima bomb would be located at RAF Lakenheath in Suffolk under the proposals, the Telegraph reported.
The US previously placed nuclear missiles at RAF Lakenheath and removed them in 2008 after the cold war threat from Moscow receded. Pentagon documents seen by the newspaper reveal procurement contracts for a new facility at the airbase.
A Ministry of Defence spokesperson said: “It remains a longstanding UK and Nato policy to neither confirm nor deny the presence of nuclear weapons at a given location.”
Yeah we need another nuclear arms race. Turning Europe into your nuclear backyard surely is a good idea
If memory serves me right, this was tried back in the 80s and was met with backlash from some Brits.
This is the best summary I could come up with:
The US is planning to station nuclear weapons in the UK for the first time in 15 years amid a growing threat from Russia, according to a report.
A Ministry of Defence spokesperson said: “It remains a longstanding UK and Nato policy to neither confirm nor deny the presence of nuclear weapons at a given location.”
Calls have recently come from senior figures on both sides of the Atlantic for the UK to be prepared in case of a potential war between Nato forces and Russia.
Earlier this week, Gen Sir Patrick Sanders, the outgoing head of the British army, said its 74,000-strong ranks need to be bolstered by at least 45,000 reservists and citizens in order to be better readied for possible conflict.
Carlos Del Toro, the US navy secretary, has urged the UK to “reassess” the size of its armed forces given “the threats that exist today”.
Downing Street defended the UK government’s spending on defence, saying Britain had been Washington’s “partner of choice” in its strikes against Houthi rebels in the Red Sea because of its “military strength”.
The original article contains 258 words, the summary contains 181 words. Saved 30%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!
This is just posturing, just like putler moving nukes into belarus was
Ensuring Freedom’s Future
🤮🤢🤮🧐🤮🤢🤮🧐😂
Fucking fuck off you terrorists
US needs a civil war so bad. Only thing keeping them from trying to go to war somewhere else
You do know Russia invaded Ukraine right? It also has been posturing and threatening other countries AND put nukes in Belarus right?
Two wrongs never made a right tho
So what is “right”? Do nothing then sit back and watch as Russia turns the rest of Europe into smoking rubble like Ukraine?
Also right. I don’t want to agree with the “Two wrongs don’t make a right” comment, but the idea of nuclear escalation doesn’t sit with me, because it eventually leads to M.A.D (mutually assured destruction) not as a deterrent but as a feasible reality.
I want Ukraine to push back these Russian assholes, and I’d love to see Putty suffer… but I don’t know the answer to that perfect outcome. I’m not a military strategist. I just hope that they defeat Russia.
I’m sorry for the week answer
Fair
