• Exec@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    83
    ·
    11 months ago

    Considering that even if it’s moving slow the EU won’t give its approval to that “fee despite not using anything from them”-charge.

    • bassomitron@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      69
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Yeah, I’m baffled at Apple’s response to this. Like I get WHY they’re doing it, I just don’t understand why they’d think they’ll get away with it. How would this not get slammed with more anti-competitive lawsuits in the EU? The whole reason they’re even being forced to allow 3rd party downloads was due to the anti-competitive nature of forcing everything into their app store, right?

      • lemmyvore@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        33
        ·
        11 months ago

        It’s all about testing how far they can go and what they can get away with and tying things up in legal recourse for as long as possible. They know they’ll have to comply eventually but they will drag their feet a good while more. Dumb compliance, malicious compliance, expect them to try everything. They don’t really want to do this but can’t come outright and say it.

        See also how Meta was told to stop collecting people’s data and what did they do — they offered people a choice between paying a monthly fee and giving up their data willingly. It’s this kind of devious compliance you can expect from Apple too.

      • Zak@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        11 months ago

        I just don’t understand why they’d think they’ll get away with it.

        They don’t. Looking at Wikipedia’s summary of the DMA, it appears there’s a lot of room for interpretation and detailed rulings from regulators with respect to each gatekeeper company’s obligations. Apple is choosing an interpretation that’s extremely favorable to Apple as an opening position in what’s sure to be a negotiation if not a court battle.

        Regulators could take the position that Apple must allow users to install applications from any source with no interference by or payments to Apple, and I wouldn’t be surprised if the final outcome is close to that.

    • saltesc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      I’m charging you $1 for that comment. I’ll have my lawyers tally your overview and they’ll provide the total sum you owe me.

      I’m all about customer care so I’m happy to extend the usual 30 day due period out to 90, but you’ll need to subscribe to the Protection Plan for that benefit, which is only $4.99 a month. But your first 100 comments are free. So, really it’s a way better option for you financially over the 24 month period the contract runs for. If you comment a lot, you might be interested in the Premium Plan.

      For an extra $2.99, the Premium plan also means I’ll manage your password and post for you.

      But don’t take my word for it, here’s Doja Cat…