A controversial rule restricting speech about Israel was dropped after artists abandoned festival lineups in Germany’s techno mecca.

    • PonyOfWar@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      68
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Even if you believe Israel to be completely justified in everything they do, there should never be a blanket ban on criticizing the methods of a country at war.

      • MrCookieRespect@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        71
        ·
        1 year ago

        The ban wasn’t on criticism it was on their blunt antisemitism and terrorism support. There has been lost of criticism in Germany about Israels methods.

        • PonyOfWar@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          51
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Sure, it was, at least according to the article. Emphasis mine:

          which explicitly forbids any speech that “questions Israel’s right to exist” or criticizes the country’s occupation of Palestinian land.

          • muelltonne@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            And that is why Vice is a trash publication. Here is the correct text:

            „Alle potenziellen Zuwendungsempfängerinnen und –empfänger bekennen sich damit zu einer vielfältigen Gesellschaft und gegen jede Form von Antisemitismus gemäß der Antisemitismus-Definition der International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA) und ihrer Erweiterung durch die Bundesregierung. Sie verpflichten sich dazu, alles Notwendige zu veranlassen, um sicherzustellen, dass die gewährten Fördergelder keinen Vereinigungen zugutekommen, die als terroristisch und/oder extremistisch eingestuft werden.“ “All potential grant recipients are thus committed to a diverse society and against all forms of antisemitism in accordance with the definition of antisemitism of the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA) and its extension by the German government. They undertake to take all necessary steps to ensure that the funding granted does not benefit associations that are classified as terrorist and/or extremist.”

            https://www.tagesspiegel.de/kultur/chialo-erlass-gegen-antisemitismus-berlins-kultureinrichtungen-bekommen-neue-forderrichtlinien-11006422.html

            And what is in the IHRA-definition?

            “Anti-Semitism is a certain perception of Jews that can be expressed as hatred towards Jews. Anti-Semitism is directed in word or deed against Jewish or non-Jewish individuals and/or their property as well as against Jewish community institutions or religious institutions. In addition, the state of Israel, which is understood as a Jewish collective, can also be the target of such attacks.”

            https://www.auswaertiges-amt.de/de/aussenpolitik/kultur-und-gesellschaft/-/216610

            There’s nothing in there about “criticising the countries occupation of Palestinian lands”. You just can’t fucking mask your antisemitism by raging against Israel.

            • PonyOfWar@pawb.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              12
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              That is some valuable context, thank you. Definitely seems like skewed reporting from Vice. The definition as you posted it definitely seems better than what Vice reported, though its last sentence is so vague that it could easily be used to silence criticism, whether it was meant to do that or not.

            • sqgl@beehaw.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              That makes me even more confused. Are those artists now going to be allowed to play and spread antisemitism (as defined above)?

              • MrCookieRespect@reddthat.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                37
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                It is, its idiotic and they stole the land as well.

                This is the same argument Russia has for Ukraine btw.

                • tryptaminev 🇵🇸 🇺🇦 🇪🇺@feddit.de
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  31
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  No they didn’t. Even the christian crusaders, who where happy to commit pogroms against jews in Europe as a sort of “motivational entertainment” had to note the peaceful coexistence of jews, christians and muslims under islamic rule.

                  The Palestinians of today are the descendants of the biblical abrahamic tribes. White european, often secular, jews, who now control Israel are killing the people whose lineage is closer to David and Abraham, than theirs could ever be.

            • Maeve@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              They did until Balfour decided to just take land from people already there and arbitrarily draw new lines on a map, probably with a sharpie.

    • highduc
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Israel are the terrorists in this case.

      • ThermoToaster@exng.meme
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        Please keep it civil here. After all we can still discuss and explain why some opinions are objectively bad.