Leo@lemmy.linuxuserspace.show to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 11 months agoNew UEFI vulnerabilities send firmware devs industry wide scramblingarstechnica.comexternal-linkmessage-square44fedilinkarrow-up1246arrow-down12cross-posted to: news@lemmy.linuxuserspace.showpulse_of_truth@infosec.pub
arrow-up1244arrow-down1external-linkNew UEFI vulnerabilities send firmware devs industry wide scramblingarstechnica.comLeo@lemmy.linuxuserspace.show to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 11 months agomessage-square44fedilinkcross-posted to: news@lemmy.linuxuserspace.showpulse_of_truth@infosec.pub
minus-squareBlackmist@lemmy.worldcakelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down3·11 months agoIt’s that necessarily a good thing? I remember suddenly needing a firewall on my PC back in the days of the Blaster worm. Do we really want all those crappy IoT devices open on all ports to the general internet?
minus-squareryannathans@aussie.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9·11 months agoNAT is not security. We aren’t talking about replacing friewalls.
It’s that necessarily a good thing?
I remember suddenly needing a firewall on my PC back in the days of the Blaster worm.
Do we really want all those crappy IoT devices open on all ports to the general internet?
NAT is not security. We aren’t talking about replacing friewalls.