• Users of those services will be steered toward the web
  • Searches indicate apps from Meta may also be unavailable

Bypass paywall: https://archive.ph/4kfYI

  • KevonLooney@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    11 months ago

    Your confusion probably relates to your idea that people dislike the cost of Vision Pro, as opposed to any actual problems with the product. All those other products were expensive versions of things that existed already that people used.

    VR has existed for 40 years (remember Tron?). The reason it never took off is because the headset sucks and gives you a headache after an hour. That’s basically it. People will buy most anything, but a headache is pushing it.

    • ji17br
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      I’m not confused at all. The reason people get headaches it’s a tech issue. Not a VR issue. Low resolution screen, low refresh rate, and heavy headsets are the cause of those issues. Technology has not advanced enough to solve those issues. Apple has created the best option so far, but there’s still a lot of room to improve.

      Due to the better tech in Vision Pro I wouldn’t be surprised if the amount of people getting headaches compared to other headsets is lower, but not zero unfortunately.

      I’m not sure how you can say in good conscience that people don’t dislike the price. Go into any thread regarding Vision Pro and price will by far be the most discussed topic.

      • KevonLooney@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        That’s because the technology sucks. If it really was revolutionary, $3500 would be a bargain.

        People pay that right now for gaming computers. If it could replace that, it would be worth it. Many people own toys more expensive than that (motorcycles, boats, jet skis). People with mobility issues spend that amount on their wheelchair and can barely go to the Grand Canyon, let alone more remote places.

        It’s just a technology issue. It sucks.

        • ji17br
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          The technology is years ahead of anything else.

          Why are you comparing bleeding edge technology to a motorbike? Literally the stupidest comparison I’ve seen.

          You clearly just want to shit on the product and have no intention to having an honest discussion.

          • Streetdog@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            This has been pretty much the case in this community. It’s more for people to praise the tech they’re owning right now, and removed about anything they don’t own. I’m just browsing, not sure if there’s a futurism community. Your arguments would find better ground there, unfortunately.

            • ji17br
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              11 months ago

              Sadly I suspect you are right.

    • Zoolander@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      This doesn’t make any sense at all. You know Tron was fiction, right? VR existed back then in the same way that neural prosthetics do now. There are like 5 working versions and none of them are functional enough to be used by the public. “The headset sucks and gives you a headache” is a nonsense generalization. There are hundreds of headsets out there and many people can use any number of them without any headache whatsoever.

      The parent is right. This is the same pattern that repeats every time. People say it’ll never take off and then it absolutely does.