NegativeNull@lemm.ee@lemm.ee to politics @lemmy.worldEnglish · 10 months agoFederal appeals court rules Texas book bans likely violate Constitutionthehill.comexternal-linkmessage-square6fedilinkarrow-up1216arrow-down11cross-posted to: texas@lemmy.world
arrow-up1215arrow-down1external-linkFederal appeals court rules Texas book bans likely violate Constitutionthehill.comNegativeNull@lemm.ee@lemm.ee to politics @lemmy.worldEnglish · 10 months agomessage-square6fedilinkcross-posted to: texas@lemmy.world
minus-square0110010001100010@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up47arrow-down1·10 months agoLikely…LIKELY?!
minus-squarecannibalkitteh@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up20·10 months agoThat is the wording they often use on injunctions. As there has not been a full trial they like to keep it as “likely”.
minus-squareIt's A Faaaahhkeah!@lemmus.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·10 months agoAhh so it’s like “Allegedly”, a legal safety net.
minus-squareNegativeNull@lemm.ee@lemm.eeOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·10 months agoI was confused on that as well.
Likely…LIKELY?!
That is the wording they often use on injunctions. As there has not been a full trial they like to keep it as “likely”.
Ahh so it’s like “Allegedly”, a legal safety net.
I was confused on that as well.