Rolling Stone spoke with diehard Trump supporters who waited hours in the snow to watch the former president stump in New Hampshire

Fresh off a historic victory in the Iowa caucuses, former President Donald Trump traveled to New Hampshire and complained to his supporters that he had to leave the White House after losing the 2020 election.

Fans had lined up for hours outside in the snow for a chance to see the presumptive Republican nominee in person — excited over his Iowa win, appearing confident he will once again be president.

During his speech, Trump said it “was ridiculous that we had to leave, but we had to leave, we have to follow the laws of our land.” He quickly doubled down on his 2020 election lies: “They don’t investigate the people that cheated in the election. They investigate the people that understand they cheated and go after them. But they don’t investigate the people who cheated like hell. We have to have fair and free elections.”

Of course, Trump is being prosecuted for attempting to rig the 2020 election and overturn the results in key swing states — and as Rolling Stone has reported, he and his allies are working diligently to predetermine the results of the 2024 election and make sure they favor Trump.

  • Vespair@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    11 months ago

    That’s awesome to hear and a great principle to have! Tell me what steps you’ve taken to personally motivate the Democratic party to run primaries and which candidate you’re choosing to support in the primaries and how exactly you’re providing said support.

    Or if you’re talking third party, that’s awesome too! Please tell me the steps you’re taking to legitimatize your chosen candidate, raise awareness of them, and prepare them and their supporters for opposition. I’m excited to hear the stories of both your hard fought battles, and more importantly since this is paramount to the viability of this as a strategy, the wins and achievements you’ve accomplished so far so as to cement your candidate as a legitimate option!

    And then, if you’re really feeling up for sharing, I would love to hear at which point in the process after your chosen candidate has either lost their primary slot (if they do so, god forbid) or been proven statistically irrelevant as a third party (which I truly, truly, as somebody who has actually worked with local third party candidates in their campaigns, hope doesn’t happen) in the general election will you concede that your battle was hard-fought but ultimately lost in greater war effort that is change and make the reasonable harm reduction choice to vote for the objectively better of the two remaining viable candidates rather than standing on your own ideological purity selfishly at real world expense of greater harm befalling countless real world America citizens?

    • Sybil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      I’m excited to hear the stories of both your hard fought battles, and more importantly since this is paramount to the viability of this as a strategy, the wins and achievements you’ve accomplished

      it’s not a strategy. it’s a vote.

    • Sybil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      11 months ago

      Tell me what steps you’ve taken to personally motivate the Democratic party to run primaries and which candidate you’re choosing to support in the primaries and how exactly you’re providing said support.

      i don’t do that.

    • Sybil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      11 months ago

      been proven statistically irrelevant as a third party (which I truly, truly, as somebody who has actually worked with local third party candidates in their campaigns, hope doesn’t happen) in the general election will you concede that your battle was hard-fought but ultimately lost in greater war effort that is change and make the reasonable harm reduction choice to vote for the objectively better of the two remaining viable candidates

      this whole narrative of viability is a snow-job. a candidate is viable if they win, and no one wins until the election is over.

    • Sybil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      11 months ago

      Please tell me the steps you’re taking to legitimatize your chosen candidate

      why should i try to legitimize any candidate?

    • Sybil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      11 months ago

      i said vote. i will spend like… 2 hours a year participating in electoralism at maximum. unless you count whining on the internet.

    • Sybil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      11 months ago

      standing on your own ideological purity selfishly

      that’s not whats happening

      • Vespair@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        My friend, that is the good faith benefit of the doubt reading of what’s happening. If that’s not what’s happening, that is not in your favor.

        • Sybil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          11 months ago

          it’s not selfish to cast a vote for the person i want to win. everyone does that.