• firadin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    If it has such a small effect, why is Apple so hell-bent on stopping it?

    • Prethoryn Overmind@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Because purchases not made in the App Store are purchases Apple isn’t making revenue from.

      Mac already can side load and Windows can side load these days as well. Hell my fucking Chromebook that is going on, 7 years old can side load Linux software and Android applications and not any single damn one of my machines have I had a security concern with an app.

      Most people don’t even know what side loading is. Apple was hellbent on stopping it because it stops revenue.

      • sunbeam60@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        ·
        1 year ago

        Windows can sideload? You’re making it sound like Windows has somehow allowed this lately; reality is “side loading” was just called “installing” since time immemorial.

      • uranibaba@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Isn’t it more about branding and control? Apple sells a package deal, an experience. Allowing a third party in could hurt their image.