• BlueBockser@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    11 months ago

    Revenue is the wrong metric for this type of comparison. Last I heard even big tech didn’t have a profit margin of 100%.

    • Radiant_sir_radiant@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      11 months ago

      I don’t know, a percentage of revenue hurts more than the same percentage of net profit. Maybe some companies need to be forced to operate at a net loss until they clean up their act.

      • BlueBockser@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        I’m not arguing about the fines themselves, those can indeed be scaled by revenue. I also agree that many fines should be higher to prevent companies from merely seeing them as an operating cost.

        However, my point is that company revenue can’t be used 1:1 to pay off fines. That doesn’t take into account that revenue also has to cover all other operating expenses and taxes. As an example, the article states that Meta would take roughly 5½ days to pay off its fines, but taking the 23.42% profit margin into account a more realistic answer is 23½ days.

        • Radiant_sir_radiant@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          11 months ago

          You’re making good points and I think we’re on the same page. I agree that revenue does not equal profit, I just want the fines to be as high as possible.