• LemmyIsFantastic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    11 months ago

    Nah, that’s insane. Both my wife and I work 40 hours a week and raise a toddler.

    If you are doing 60 hours weeks sure that’s valid but at the risk of being called boomer that’s some bullshit. It takes 2 hours tops to shop every week and a half hour to make a decent meal. You have plenty of time to do that on a 40 hour week.

    • SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      I do most of the week’s cooking ahead of time on the weekend, giving me even more time to relax if I’ve had a long day.

    • shalafi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      I wouldn’t even say 2 hours of shopping time, but yeah. I hate shopping, so I run in and out, 30 minutes tops. I commented here, but I think the problem is people don’t know how to cook. They find a recipe online, hunt all over the store for the ingredients, go home, cook it up, look at the time spent. Now they have leftover ingredients and think those are a waste.

      If you already know a few dozen things you like, you already know where to find those ingredients in the store. And whatever your tastes, there’s bound to be crossover. I love me some Mexican. With the same few ingredients, I can make loads of different dishes.

      Learning takes time up front, just like any skill. And yeah, you’ll spend money ramping up the pantry and fridge, and you’ll waste money starting out. Figuring out how to feed yourself is part of growing up.

      • LemmyIsFantastic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        I’m being generous for the sake of argument. I can fill an entire us grocery cart and be out the door inside of 45 minutes.

    • evasive_chimpanzee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      Yeah, definitely still possible, but my point is that wages no longer support having one person that can devote their whole day to cooking/cleaning/etc. No matter how good you are at cooking dinner in 30 minutes, you would be able to make better and cheaper meals given 8 hours.

      • LemmyIsFantastic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        11 months ago

        I honestly don’t think that really true though. Frozen and fresh produce + protein, beans, rice is about as cheap as you get. Maaaaybe you save a few bucks buying in bulk at Costco but that’s an extreme for limited gains. And adding time to food prep doesn’t necessarily make it better. You can eat very very well in the US on 5 hours and $100 a week.

        • SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          11 months ago

          Buying in bulk can actually realize significant savings. It’s definitely true that more active time does not directly translate to more savings, especially with just a little planning. Lots of food is happy to cook itself while you wait.