• RightHandOfIkaros@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    limitations on the amount of time that a performance replica can be employed without further payment, and consent.

    So games will be removed from shelves later on because the AI voice passed its expiry date and the developers didnt want to or couldnt afford to renew it? The same exact problem we have seen lately with why certain games are no longer available due to music licenses?

      • Makeitstop@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        10 months ago

        It’s OK, the AI will allow companies to churn out low effort content for live service games, and the license only has to last until the game ceases to make money and the servers get shut down.

    • bogdugg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Well, there’s two ways you could interpret that:

      • As you say, ‘shelf life’, how long they can sell the game with their voice in it
      • Or, ‘voice time’, as in, contracts are negotiated in total duration of voice lines. Exceeding that number requires renegotiation.

      I suspect it’s the latter as that is more similar to how voice work is already done, to my understanding.

    • mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      That would be ridiculous, and make generated lines even less useful than simple recordings. Presumably they mean new lines cannot be generated, past a certain date. That’d let the studio continue doing the character without needing the actor… in that game, for a while.