Question inspired by the image (see attached)

  • rosymind@leminal.space
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    I agree that it has to do with definition. My definition of language might be of a wider range than yours (and linguists)

    My cat, for example, might not use grammer but I can certainly communicate with her (and she with me!) In this sense she and I have a language between us that’s a mix of signs, sounds, and body language. It’s not possible for me to seperate our talks from language, even though our understanding of each other doesn’t cover specifics.

    So if someone communicates with me via emoji, and I understund accurately, I would count it as language (even if it goes against classical definitions)

    • hakase@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Fair enough.

      What would you say about a dog growling at you, communicating its displeasure at how close you are? If you back away, understanding what the dog intends to convey with its growl, does that make the dog’s growl language?

      Is a honeybee secreting a pheromone to get the hive to swarm language?

      If so, how is language meaningfully different from “communication”? And, is human communication with each other the same type of phenomenon as the cases you and I mentioned, or is there some sort of categorical difference there?

      (Also, this definition isn’t classical - it’s quite modern. The tendency to conflate writing with language in cultures that have writing is as old as writing is, and disentangling the two is a relatively modern discovery.)