• Serinus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    10 months ago

    It’s just common sense that eating a plant is more efficient than growing many, many plants in order to feed an animal that is then eaten.

    That said, I’m not willing to make that much of a personal sacrifice to push a boulder the size of Texas less than an inch. If we really want to make a difference, we need systemic change.

    I’d absolutely support a 100% tax on meat. It’d be easier for us all to change if we did it together.

    • Fuck Work@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Sure, but that legislation is not on the table because the meat lobby wont even let people see what the inside of a slaughterhouse looks like and actually because of their lobbying power the exact opposite of what you are suggesting is true; instead of taxing meat, our tax dollars go to subsidize meat to keep it cheaper than plant based alternatives. We do actually need people to change individual habits, because the political machine has huge incentives not to change at all. Perhaps if the plant based lobby could become big enough to challenge the meat lobby we could make bigger changes, but that will require individuals making small changes in their diets first.

      • Serinus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        It’s not on the table because it’d be wildly unpopular, and anyone who proposed it would never get reelected.

        Can’t say I know how to fix that, but that’s what I’d rather work on.