psychothumbs@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.worldEnglish · 10 months agoWelcome to 2024, the Year We Stop Trump’s Rolling Insurrectionwww.thenation.comexternal-linkmessage-square168fedilinkarrow-up1560arrow-down127cross-posted to: usa
arrow-up1533arrow-down1external-linkWelcome to 2024, the Year We Stop Trump’s Rolling Insurrectionwww.thenation.compsychothumbs@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.worldEnglish · 10 months agomessage-square168fedilinkcross-posted to: usa
minus-squareHACKthePRISONS@kolektiva.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up0·10 months ago>You just keep giving me examples of how you don’t actually understand what fascism means. someone should take your keyboard and replace it with a mirror
minus-squareLillyPip@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up1·10 months agoSo you don’t have a reasonable argument, then. Ad hominem is a weak escape hatch.
minus-squareHACKthePRISONS@kolektiva.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up0·10 months agoit’s not ad hominem. it’s tu quoque.
minus-squareLillyPip@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up1·10 months agoTomato tomahto. Attacking the person rather than the point is weak.
minus-squareHACKthePRISONS@kolektiva.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up0·10 months agoi’m saying that you don’t understand the topic, and you’re telling me the same thing. that’s hardly attacking the person.
minus-squareLillyPip@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up1·10 months agoI linked the actual definition and asked you for evidence to support your point, which you haven’t provided. If you know so much more than me, please prove me wrong. Personal attacks don’t make you seem like you know what you’re talking about.
minus-squareHACKthePRISONS@kolektiva.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up0·10 months ago>>I linked the actual definition and asked you for evidence to support your point, which you haven’t provided. yes, i did. you just don’t like it.
minus-squareLillyPip@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up1·10 months agoNo you didn’t. This has become tiresome. I’ll make it simpler for you: please go through the 14 points of fascism and give an example for each that show the Democrats are trying to enact it. It shouldn’t be hard. I did it for the GOP without even trying.
minus-squareHACKthePRISONS@kolektiva.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up0·10 months ago>I’ll make it simpler for you: please go through the 14 points of fascism and give an example for each that show the Democrats are trying to enact it. the republicans don’t hit all 14, either. but that doesn’t make them any less fascist.
minus-squareHACKthePRISONS@kolektiva.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up0·10 months ago>This has become tiresome. refusing to learn seems exhausting. you should take a break.
>You just keep giving me examples of how you don’t actually understand what fascism means.
someone should take your keyboard and replace it with a mirror
So you don’t have a reasonable argument, then. Ad hominem is a weak escape hatch.
it’s not ad hominem. it’s tu quoque.
Tomato tomahto. Attacking the person rather than the point is weak.
i’m saying that you don’t understand the topic, and you’re telling me the same thing. that’s hardly attacking the person.
I linked the actual definition and asked you for evidence to support your point, which you haven’t provided.
If you know so much more than me, please prove me wrong. Personal attacks don’t make you seem like you know what you’re talking about.
>>I linked the actual definition and asked you for evidence to support your point, which you haven’t provided.
yes, i did. you just don’t like it.
No you didn’t. This has become tiresome.
I’ll make it simpler for you: please go through the 14 points of fascism and give an example for each that show the Democrats are trying to enact it.
It shouldn’t be hard. I did it for the GOP without even trying.
>I’ll make it simpler for you: please go through the 14 points of fascism and give an example for each that show the Democrats are trying to enact it.
the republicans don’t hit all 14, either. but that doesn’t make them any less fascist.
>This has become tiresome.
refusing to learn seems exhausting. you should take a break.