• dev_null
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    3 months ago

    the browser has the capabilities to differentiate devices

    The browser can do it whether this exists or not. The only information the website gets is that the browser supports this feature or not, and nothing else.

    • bitfucker@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      My bad, I worded that badly. What I meant is that the website now has access to those features via the browser (js or some other mechanism). Now suddenly fingerprinting a device can be made easier.

      • dev_null
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        That’s a valid concern, but according to the article all the website can access is the random public key, or the fact that the feature is unsupported in this browser (for an unspecified reason).

        • bitfucker@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          Yeah, I’ve also read the article. I am just being cautious on how it can be used for other things that cause privacy concern. And so far, I’ve come up blank too.