@starman@programming.dev to Free and Open Source Software@beehaw.orgEnglish • 2 months agoPlease don't use Discord for FOSS projectsdrewdevault.commessage-square32fedilinkarrow-up1317arrow-down11 cross-posted to: opensource@programming.devopensourcehackernews@lemmy.smeargle.fanslibre_cultureopensourcelibre_software
arrow-up1316arrow-down1external-linkPlease don't use Discord for FOSS projectsdrewdevault.com@starman@programming.dev to Free and Open Source Software@beehaw.orgEnglish • 2 months agomessage-square32fedilink cross-posted to: opensource@programming.devopensourcehackernews@lemmy.smeargle.fanslibre_cultureopensourcelibre_software
minus-square@Kissaki@feddit.delinkfedilinkEnglish7•2 months agoI don’t think it should be a client feature. It should be federated, like the posts are.
minus-squareDark ArclinkfedilinkEnglish6•edit-22 months agoI think the issue with federation of comments is moderation of comments. You might not like the admins of example.org:foo but you might have no issues with the admins of example.com:foo.
minus-square@noddy@beehaw.orglinkfedilink1•2 months agoI was just thinking about a possible solution based on what we have. I agree it would be better if cross post comments were federated, but I guess there’s different opinions on that (do the lemmy devs agree for example?).
I don’t think it should be a client feature. It should be federated, like the posts are.
I think the issue with federation of comments is moderation of comments.
You might not like the admins of
example.org:foobut you might have no issues with the admins ofexample.com:foo.I was just thinking about a possible solution based on what we have. I agree it would be better if cross post comments were federated, but I guess there’s different opinions on that (do the lemmy devs agree for example?).