I feel like I may be missing something when it comes to BlueSky, or maybe both I and those trying it out are but in different ways. My understanding is that BlueSky is currently like the Mastodon Social instance is for Mastodon but of the AT Protocol under development, with the long term aim being that once their protocol is sufficiently developed to their liking, they’ll put out the version capable of federation for others to spin up their own instances with.

However, once they do that, won’t it basically create some of the same problems people already have with ActivityPub, i.e. instance choice, federation confusion, etc.?

What’s supposed to set it apart and address existing issues rather than reinvent things and add their own distinct issues?

  • fediverse_report
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    Oh thats an interesting question! I’m assuming you are talking about the UX/UI of instance selection?

    And thats not something I have written about (neither does another article pop into my mind either sadly), but interesting idea for an article for sure to write about

    • Otter@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      Yes that’s it, and no worries! Looking forward to the future articles