- cross-posted to:
- hackernews@lemmy.smeargle.fans
- cross-posted to:
- hackernews@lemmy.smeargle.fans
There is a discussion on Hacker News, but feel free to comment here as well.
There is a discussion on Hacker News, but feel free to comment here as well.
I’m not surprised that you’re a failure to distinguish between “this is not against the law” and “this abuses a loophole of the law”.
What he said is mentioned in the very comment that you’re replying to.
Wow, this is news for… nobody.
Brazil is not demanding Canada to obey Brazilian laws. Brazil is demanding Rumble to obey Brazilian laws if conducting businesses in Brazil, or cease operations in Brazil. Rumble did the later, as per news in the OP (that you likely didn’t read either).
The internet and online services make this specially messy but it’s the basic gist of it.
[NB: I don’t expect the above to be able to parse a single sentence, I’m answering his shitpost for the sake of other users.]