• RmDebArc_5OP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s confusing if there are more than one version of an app and the fact that the command to install one installs the other doesn’t make it better

        • fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          There’s already more than one version without snap, it’s already a confusing mess. Not all distros are compatible with the exact same binaries. And people probably don’t want to compile everything form source.

          Snap could potentially unify things, and remove all of that confusion.

          • RmDebArc_5OP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            And then Canonical would control Linux apps, sounds like a good idea

      • rambaroo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Flatpaks are just as easy to use without the drawbacks of snaps. There’s no reason to use snaps excet for Canonical pushing them on end users.

        And frankly snaps frequently don’t work well, that’s the entire reason people hate them.