I’ve noticed in a lot of Reddit threads the outright hostility towards Nintendo games and Nintendo fans in general gaming subreddits.
I really hope this isn’t the case here.
I’ve noticed in a lot of Reddit threads the outright hostility towards Nintendo games and Nintendo fans in general gaming subreddits.
I really hope this isn’t the case here.
People like to bash Nintendo because of them going legally against fans that decide to revive older games that no longer available to be played using legal and/or official means.
This is really a gray area and people agree/disagree on this.
If for example OOT is not able to be played at all but a dude hacks the code and puts it on an emulator, then is that wrong or not?
Legally it’s wrong, but there’s an argument to be made that since Nintendo doesn’t offer this game, technically their are not losing profit.
Ultimately it’s a totally gray area and civil discussion on the topic should be welcomed and not suppressed, ever.
The dude didn’t hacked the Code of OOT and the dudes behind the Emulator also didn’t hacked or pirated the software of the device. Its called clean room development and is totally legal; it would only become legally questional or outright illegal when they reuse codes they attained from the reverse engineering of the devices software.
Dumping the ROM of a Cartridge is also not illegal as you own the Cartridge and therefore the Software/ROM. Providing it to others who may or may not have the Cartridge, now THAT is a grayzone.
So the argument still stands across the board= Emulation is not Illegal, regardless of Nintendo spouting that false claim or using Emulation for their own retro games collections or VC or Nintendo Online.> People like to bash Nintendo because of them going legally against fans that decide to revive older games that no longer available to be played using legal and/or official means.
Was it scummy by Nintendo going against Guasti (original developer of AM2R)? Absolutely, was it in their legal rights? Absolutely.