• SinningStromgald@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        34
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        8 months ago

        You should probably click the link and read the tshirt before commenting. It actually about policy issues not his genitals.

        • BuddyTheBeefaloOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          I previously added the quote “Now you can buy it in Medium, Large, Extra-Large, or in the size of Trump’s manhood, Small.” to the link. I removed it because I also think it’s kind of stupid.

          I can imagine that everything they state is well thought through, there is going to be an important Supreme Court decision. Maybe they try to include this kind of insult in the case.

          • hogunner@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            I’m not trying to start an argument but I don’t see anywhere in the OP’s article where it specifically mentions Trump’s genitals. The closest I can find is:

            “Despite outward appearances, this case is really not about Trump or the size of his policies or [body parts],” said Ms. Sunderji.

            Did I miss it?

      • ZeroCool@feddit.ch
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        31
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        8 months ago

        I’ll tell you what. The day Trump stops attacking people for their appearance and physical attributes, we’ll quit giving him a taste of his own medicine. Sound good, bud? Fantastic.